There are three viewpoints

Accommodating conflict handling mechanism

However if accommodation is

You may be overusing the collaborative approach to conflict if others are uncommitted to your decisions or policies. On the other hand conflict of interests means where a person or group demands certain privileges, but there is no law or right in existence.

At times, it may improve even a difficult situation. In this case, it is necessary to adopt a competitive strategy to protect yourself and your interests.

However, if accommodation is the only style a person utilizes, he or she is advised to learn more skills. The benefit of facing the conflict does not outweigh the cost of doing so.

Relationship conflict comes under the scope of affective conflicts. The traditionalists view conflict as bad and be avoided. The integrationists view conflict as inevitable and stimulating conflict to some extent is helpful. The lead person to present and clarify the background of the conflict Problem identification i Clearly explain your problem in terms of behaviour, consequences, and feelings.

The benefit of facing the

Conflict-Handling Cheat Sheet Below you will find an explanation of when to use, and when not to use, each conflict-handling mode in relation to common conflicts encountered in the business world. Destructive conflicts are also known as dysfunctional conflicts, because such conflicts prevent a group from attaining its goals. Some people think competing is bad. Some people will take advantage of those who display noncompetitive behavior.

The People Development People. The core reason is to avoid a frank conversation. Ask directed questions to maintain balance.

No two persons are the same. Conflict occurs when individuals or groups are not obtaining what they need or want and are seeking their own self-interest. To be most effective, leaders need to use all of these conflict styles. You may be overusing the compromising mode if the insistence on compromising takes away focus on larger issues, or if you notice a cynical climate of gamesmanship. If there are serious differences between two or among more than two groups, the latent conflict in a competitive situation may turn out into conflict.